Zaporozhtseva Galina Biography

Currently lives in Moscow as a political emigrant. About post -Soviet lawlessness, Ukraine as a historical community has come a difficult path. It combined community in the southeast and Khutoryansky in the central and western part of the management of the economy, while the proletariat prevailed in the Donbass. The basis of the mentality of the overwhelming part of the people of Ukraine is the commitment to family values ​​and the desire to directly communicate with God to search for truth.

As for the current Ukrainian realities, it should be stated that the people of Ukraine, through the efforts of the top of the authorities that came to the leadership of the country with the help of the coup, is amazed in their rights, and this applies not only to the inhabitants of Donbass. In relation to the inhabitants of the Donbass, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine is about the rest of the inhabitants of Ukraine, they are waited for unemployment, a drop in living standards, unreasonable arrests, as was the case with the journalist Katsaba and writer Miroslava Bernik.

At the same time, a public discussion of issues of violation of human rights are the subject of criminal prosecution for criticism of the current government. To date, the people of Ukraine have remained unprotected from crime, from political repressions in case of disagreement with the current authority, experiences discrimination on religious, linguistic, national signs. All this turns Ukraine into pitch hell.

An eternal and unresolved question arises: what to do? What to do with those who massively left Ukraine and fled from the raging neo -Nazis to Russia, seeing in it the only defender of his life? What to do to those who, realizing themselves part of the fraternal triune people of the Russian-Ukrainian-Belarusians, remains to live in the territory covered by the latest brown plague?

One of the ways to get out of the crisis that has developed in Ukraine is seen in the return of the country to the legal field, in which one of the basic principles is the right of each people to independently decide on the form of their state existence, to freely establish their political status and implement their economic and cultural development. This principle in Ukraine was implemented only twice.

The first time at the All -Union referendum, which took place on March 17 of the year, to which the question was issued about the preservation of the USSR as an updated federation of equal sovereign republics. Then the question sounded: “Do you consider it necessary to preserve the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics as an updated federation of equal sovereign republics, in which will be fully guaranteed the rights and freedoms of man of any nationality?

For most residents of Ukraine, the provisions of citizenship were the key points of this declaration: “The Ukrainian SSR has its own citizenship and guarantees each citizen the right to preserve citizenship of the USSR”. The declaration also clearly formulated the obligation to maintain allied relations: "The principles of the declaration of the sovereignty of Ukraine are used to conclude a union agreement." The second and last referendum in Ukraine, which was heard and taken into account by the Ukrainian authorities, is a referendum that has passed after the sad events of the State Emergency Committee in Moscow, where the Ukrainian people adopted an act of independence.

Few people thought about the fact that the legally referendum, in Art. Accordingly, we can safely say that a referendum held in December in Ukraine is illegal. Thus, the emergence of new states in the space of the USSR from the point of view of international legal norms should be recognized as illegal, since they arose not only against the will of most citizens of the USSR, but also contrary to the current legislation.

As for the December referendum, he was nothing more than a deceit of Ukrainian citizens who were promised that on the basis of the declaration of independence, an agreement on an updated union of independent states within the framework of the former Soviet Union would be signed. Ukraine today represents a country whose population is one third of paranoid syndrome. Its course progresses and tends to go into the acute phase of the disease - mass psychosis [1].

In the stage in which people will not even remember what they are doing. The question arises: who will tell them about this and who will force the patient to undergo examination and begin treatment? Given the development of the current set of adverse factors, economic, socio-political, legal, in Ukraine it should be expected:-continuing the rapid deterioration of the country's economic situation and the standard of living of its population; - further aggravation of social tension within Ukrainian society and the continuation of a fall in confidence in government representatives; - further disappointment with relations with the EU countries in connection with the failure to fulfill their premium promises; - further growth of tension between armed formations and increased anti -war sentiments in parts of regular aircraft and territorial battalions; - preservation and strengthening of centrifugal trends, that is, the beginning of the creeping federalization of Ukraine, if not its direct decay.

It becomes obvious that with the further preservation of objectively acting trends and factors in one form or another, an attempt will be attempt to change power, inspired by any influential oligarchic structures and their political forces. This will lead to a sharp exacerbation of the situation inside the country up to objective disagreements between its different regions.

The greatest danger in this situation is the beginning of a real civil war not only in the Donbass, but also on a common Ukrainian scale. Within the framework of this article, it is impossible to describe those approaches and principles that should be implemented to prepare the new political elite of Ukraine that can normalize the situation in the country [2]. The issue of creating information centers and means that could in a short time to correctly configure the public opinion of Ukraine is also related to this circle of questions, curing it from the aforementioned paranoid syndrome in a militarized form.

In this sense, this article is designed only to start a serious conversation about the ways of returning Ukraine to the bosom of the Russian world, but in no way to exhaust this topic. At the same time, there is another topic inside this topic, narrower, but at the same time extremely topical and burning, which we will now turn to. For the help of Ukrainian refugees in Russia, the most important area of ​​assistance to the Ukrainian people who have been colonized by American ruling circles should have been supporting those who were forced to leave the country and become refugees.

In many ways, it was the defeat in their rights that provoked a wave of refugees, most of whom, saving their lives, whose safety in Ukraine no one could provide them, received state protection in Russia. It should be noted that those Ukrainian citizens who still consider it their Fatherland went to Russia. But in practice it turned out that it was not so easy to legalize the Ukrainian refugee in Russia.

In those seven statuses on which refugees from Ukraine can be legally located in the Russian Federation on the Russian Federation, not everyone has still figured out. Here is their list: 1. The status of “temporary stay” provides for the presence of a citizen of Ukraine on the territory of the Russian Federation on the basis of a migration card for 90 days a preferential stay in the Russian Federation with the status of “temporary asylum” is issued to the person for one year with subsequent extension and concerns those who left their country by virtue of a reasonable danger that arises due to military operations, this status is temporary.

He left his country due to fears of the threat to become a victim of persecution on the grounds of nationality, political convictions and linguistic affiliation. The status of "Labor Emigrant" is received by persons on the basis of a bought patent. The status of "RVP" - a temporary residence permit - is issued within the quota approved by the Government of the Russian Federation.

The status of "residence permit" is a residence permit. Citizenship of the Russian Federation. In the new conditions, the study of the problems of “Ukrainian refugees” has shown that many Russian declarative statements and voiced bills were not implemented in the end. This follows from the analysis of the regulatory framework of the FMS and the practice of the work of its employees, interpreting different laws that are not agreed upon, at their discretion.

Despite the fact that the problem of refugees has acquired a massive nature, the legislators of Russia practically did not simplify the stay of refugees in the Russian Federation from Donbass and political emigrants from Ukraine. Responsible officials did not monitor the main problems and did not work out the mechanisms of their settlement. These issues are rarely raised in official media.

Today it becomes obvious that, due to the lack of coordination of the actions of the Federal Migration Service and the Ministry of Labor, the process of socialization of former residents of Ukraine is held with great difficulties. Three main problems remain unresolved: housing, employment and paperwork for obtaining Russian citizenship. As a result of monitoring the work of some departments, as well as individual officials, there was an impression of a conscious unwillingness to solve the above problems, which leads to the escalation of the atmosphere of discontent among refugees from Ukraine.At the same time, refugees from Ukraine become the object of close attention of representatives of opposition movements, which skillfully form with the help of the media controlled by the media in the mass consciousness, stable myths about refugees: myth 1.

The arrivals can independently successfully “assimilate” in Russian society within months: get a job, rent housing and keep the family. Myth 2. Refugees do not want to work, so they refuse to make low -paying work. Myth 3. Myth 4. Russians and refugees are in equal terms for employment and housing issues. In fact, the process of “assimilation” of refugees is currently practically putting on a gravity.

Many refugees have to get an unofficial job. At the same time, in case of the employer’s refusal to pay wages, they are not able to pay for housing rental, so they risk being on the street with the children. One of the unresolved problems is the situation of those who, due to health reasons or age, are not able to work. Along with this, there is no public control over the activities of officials involved in refugee problems, for example, the spending of funds allocated from the federal and regional budgets for the social and household arrangement of Ukrainian citizens at temporary accommodation and the provision of targeted assistance.

At the same time, citizens of Ukraine who could take on such public control are not allowed to create their own organizations, since under Russian law they are foreigners in Russia until the moment of receipt of citizenship. An important problem that few people talk about is the psychological state of refugees who arrived from Donbass, including children, as well as former militias and other categories of citizens who survived the strong stress of the Donbass syndrome and need psychological assistance.

Inappropriation of such assistance, according to psychologists, can lead to extremely negative consequences. From the foregoing, we can conclude that, both for objective and subjective reasons, most refugees from Ukraine are quite difficult to adapt in a new environment. Pulling up the solution of their problems will contribute to the increase in social tension, which can be used against Russia.

We all have an example with the problem of refugees in the European Union. Unfortunately, it is necessary to state that local Ukrainian organizations registered before the coup in Ukraine, for the most part, do not assist Ukrainian refugees, moreover, they often treat them hostilely. Especially often a negative attitude towards visitors can be found among student youth of Ukrainian origin.

Therefore, it seems appropriate to create a public organization from the active part of refugees who have arrived over the past two years to the territory of Russia, which could be on a permanent basis to contact representatives of the authorities and local public organizations. One of the conditions for the adaptation of refugees from Ukraine, in addition to solving their socio-household problems, should be the formation of a sense of introduction to the cultural traditions of Russia.

Currently, work in this direction is practically not underway. At the same time, it turned out that many residents of Ukraine, who arrived on an emergency in Russia, to some extent lost ethnocultural self-identification, over the long years of Ukrainization, they had undermined the connection with the Russian world. In addition, in order to form a positive attitude of the local population to refugees from Ukraine, it seems necessary to act an information policy in the issues of covering refugee problems, which will contribute to solving problems at the local level of state power.

At the same time, it should be taken into account by the fact that the flow of emigrants from Ukraine will continue, and in this regard, work should be organized with both previously moved to the Russian Federation and newly arrived citizens from Ukraine in the following areas: 1. A separate issue must be highlighted the problem of the right status of Ukrainian citizens who, under the Constitution of the Russian Federation, have the right to unhindered obtaining Russian citizenship on the fact of birth, which is about the same on April 21 However, according to the Instructions of the FMS, they only apply to the registration of all citizenship procedures, bypassing quotas, which is interpreted by many jurists as a gross violation of the legislation, the departmental instruction narrows the legal field of the law.

The thing is that, according to Article 6 of Part 3 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, in accordance with which a citizen of the former USSR, located outside the Russian Federation at the time of the entry into force of the law “On Citizenship of the Russian Federation” and did not refuse, of his own free will from the citizenship of the Russian Federation, should receive it not by registration, but upon request.This constitutional provision is consistent with part 2 of Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which establishes that “no one can be arbitrarily deprived of their citizenship or the right to change their citizenship.” To date, citizens of Ukraine who are entitled to citizenship of the Russian Federation undergo the procedure for acquiring citizenship in the procedure for registration for a simplified procedure, which requires the appropriate application with the application of a number of documents, which should be A decision was made by the authorized state body.

And only from the moment such a decision is made by an authorized person, in accordance with Article 42 of the Law “On Citizenship of the Russian Federation”, a person is considered acquired Russian citizenship and, therefore, also has such constitutional rights, including the right to protection from the Russian Federation beyond its borders, Article 61 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

The acquisition of citizenship for Russians who are considered to be the citizenship of the Russian Federation in the citizenship of the Russian Federation Part 2 of the Union 13 of the Law and have become the will of fate by citizens of Ukraine and who until today cannot become Russian citizens on the basis of their will due to the written instructions in the FMS of the Russian Federation, who were oriented not to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, but for the recent changes introduced into the law “On Citizenship of the Russian Federation” and narrowing the content of the constitution The Russian Federation, which is, according to many lawyers, unacceptable.

For many residents of Ukraine, who, on the fact of birth, considered themselves Russian and did not recognize the legitimacy of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the announcement that Russia was the successor of the USSR, became the hope of returning to the bosom of Russian civilization. However, legal conflicts, who stood on the way of former citizens of the USSR, by the right of birth consider themselves Russians, often become an obstacle to the return of compatriots to Russia and their citizenship.

People who come from Ukraine understand that Russia is not obliged to maintain them, and someone is arranged here as they can. However, they need a legal status so as not to feel like second -rate people in a once united country. Obtaining citizenship of the Russian Federation makes it possible to settle down and feel protected both in social and legal terms. This is important for another reason.

With the receipt of citizenship of the Russian Federation, many residents of Ukraine have legal grounds to appeal through the judicial system of the Russian Federation to international legal institutions to the authorities of Ukraine, which deprived them of many civil rights, with claims for compensation for moral and material damage caused by them.

At the moment, residents of Ukraine are deprived of such an opportunity in Ukraine, and in Russia they have not yet acquired it.