Vasily Shevyakov Lipetsk biography
The apartment is gorgeous, which is not surprising-the Secretary General after all. Do you think who lives in these walls now? And here they did not guess. A modest official of Rosobrnadzor lives in Brezhnev’s apartment. But this is not enough for him-now he wants to pull off another 5-room apartment. Once upon a time there was a family in Moscow. They lived in a two -room apartment in a high -rise building on Kotelnicheskaya embankment.
Since time immemorial, Vasily Nikolaevich has been friends with relatives of Viktoria Petrovna Brezhneva-they say that they once even saved them from trouble. That is why the family of the omnipotent Secretary General Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev read the Shevyakovs as very close people. In the year, Natalya Shevyakova married young actor Oleg Vidov. In the year, Oleg and Natasha had a son Glory, and the family moved to a magnificent five -room apartment - in the same house, only in another wing.
At the same time, Oleg Shevyakov married. Vasily Nikolaevich and Nina Fominichna die. Only their daughter Natalya Fedotova and grandson Vyacheslav Fedotov Natalya Vasilievna did not want her son to bear the name of Vidov and leave the name of her first husband to. In the year, Vyacheslav buys a two -room apartment. When discharge from the Kotelnikiye embankment, he abandoned his share in the apartment in favor of his mother.
After all, she was good, and he hoped that she could still arrange her life. However, these dreams were not destined to come true. Natalya Vasilievna became seriously ill. In the year at the Research Institute for them. Burdenko was done by the first operation - they removed the malignant hemangioma of the brain. For five years she felt great, but in the year she had to do a second operation.
Vyacheslav, who had acquired his family by this time, did everything possible so that the mother would not need anything.
There is nothing to say that all the costs of her treatment - and they, say neatly, considerable - he took upon himself. A year after the second operation, Natalia Vasilievna began to hurt her back. It turned out that this is not radicolite, but metastases in the spine. In May, she had a third operation, and a month later she died. She was only 62 years old.
A month before his death, she told her son that a will lies in the closet, and after her death the apartment would go to him. Vyacheslav was very hoping that Natalya Vasilievna would cope with the disease, and told her mother that it was too early to talk about it. However, he remembered the remark of Natalia Vasilievna: do not forget what I said, otherwise Oleg will take everything away.
What does Oleg have to do with it? His uncle lived in a wide leg, their relationship was beautiful. Then Vyacheslav thought that she, as always, was overproofing him too much. Well, mother is a mother, even when she is in trouble. In August, Vyacheslav went to the notary Shcherbakova, presented a testament and filed an application for the acceptance of the inheritance. After the death of his mother, the uncle touchingly took care of the nephew.
In a two -story villa with a pool there is always a place for the only son of a mild sister. In early January, Oleg Vasilievich again invited his nephew to Limasakol. He arrived for a week, and returning, he went to the notary for a certificate of inheritance. What was his amazement when the notary told him that a certain Oleg Vasilyevich Shevyakov sued him - do you know this?
Therefore, the court arrested the apartment and the certificate cannot be issued. Vyacheslav went to Perovsky at the place of his registration by the court, and there he was shown to his uncle's claim. This wild document said that the will of his sister Natalya Vasilievna Fedotova, written on November 1 in favor of his nephew Vyacheslav Fedotova, is invalid, since at the time of his compilation, Natalya Vasilievna, who underwent two operations on the brain, did not realize the nature of her actions and could not lead them.
At that moment she was in a clear mind. A year before her death on August 30, she compiled a will, according to which I was her only heir - all my property, which will be belonging to her by the day of her death, whatever it was and wherever it was, was bequeathed to me. The this testament was certified by Gerge Ekaterina Nikolaevna, and. Moscow Shcherbakova, before the expiration of a 6-month period for accepting the inheritance, I wrote a statement about the acceptance of the inheritance ...
However, from the notary I learned that there is a will, drawn up later, which my sister left all my property to my son-Fedotov V. Fedotov I know that my sister sharply objected to leave the property of her son, since he could not dispose of them the same as she would like, was very impractical, easily underwent other people's influence. In addition, in the last years of her life, their relationship was quite tense, she often told me that I would help him and support as possible - both material and moral.
However, along with this, she insisted that it was impossible to allow him to dispose of expensive property. In addition, in the fall of the year, my sister’s physical and mental state worsened markedly. She was a very sick person, had oncological diseases.On this basis, in recent months of life, she did not always realize in her actions. Moreover, her behavior in the last months of her life gave reason to believe that she did not understand the significance of her actions and could not lead them.
In connection with the indicated, I believe that at the time of the will, with which she left all her property to the defendant, that is, to her native son. Did he remember the sunny Cyprus? And did he understand why his uncle tried so hard to help him and sent his lawyer so that his beloved nephew would collect documents as quickly as possible for issuing an inheritance?
Well, yes, there is always a simple answer to every difficult question. His representative insisted on conducting a posthumous forensic psychiatric examination. According to the conclusion of the commission of experts of the SMI Social and Judicial Psychiatry named after V., at the disposal of the experts of the Serbian Institute, among other documents, there was a medical opinion of the attending physician Fedotova V.
Blokhin, where palliative chemical and radiation therapy was carried out. Her character was strong. For many years, the son was under her influence, inferior in disputes, was considered her opinion. Apparently, at the moment when Vyacheslav began to behave more independently, she got the impression that the disease could take her own at any moment. One must think, his brother willingly supported her in this and steadily led her to the idea that after her death he would be the only support of Vyacheslav.
There is nothing unusual in this plot. A deadly disease is forcing to commit actions that, under other circumstances, a person would never have committed - who does not know this? But the mother and death remains a mother. The second testament puts everything in its place. Well, if a person who almost became the owner of a magnificent apartment in the center of Moscow was not ready for this?
And the judge of the Perovsky Court A. Isaenko on December 16 made a ruling on the abandonment of Shevyakov’s claim without consideration. Here we must explain that the abandonment of the claim without consideration does not mean that the case is closed is only a pause, and at the request of one of the parties, the hearing can be resumed. It did not work out. Well, nothing, life does not end there.
After waiting for Vyacheslav to receive a certificate of inheritance, Shevyakov appeals to the Tagansky court on May 29, in whose territory the apartment is located. The new lawsuit practically word for word repeats the application to the Perovsky Court: to recognize the second testament of Natalia Fedotova invalid and invalidate the certificate of inheritance received by Vyacheslav.
The fact that Shevyakov appealed to the Tagan court, Vyacheslav recognized by accident. He came to the notary public and heard: and again he was sued ... On June 25, he goes to the judge of the Tagan court of Antonova and says: the case of the same lawsuit is already listening to the Perovsky court. To which the judge answered: on June 29 there will be a preliminary meeting, and you will tell everything there.
The secretary said that the hearing was scheduled for he tried to turn to Judge Antonova, but she refused to talk. Then Vyacheslav went to the chairman of the Tagan court Mikhail Panarin. He said that, firstly, he was not notified of the listening of the case, and secondly, he was held an hour earlier and, thirdly, the case on the same claim was already listening in the Perovsky court.
Panarin told Vyacheslav to come to Antonova by two o’clock. At this, let’s say, a forced meeting, the judge was informed that the previously initiated civil case on the same lawsuit, according to the same dispute, between the same parties and on the same basis. Judge Antonova replied that the hearing in the Curovsky court for the present case has no meaning.
And she made an appointment on July 24. Meanwhile, the Perovsky court at the request of Vyacheslav canceled the ruling of leaving the claim without consideration - remember, on December 16, when the representative of Shevyakov stopped being in court. So, the hearing in the Perovsky court was appointed on August 19. Then Vyacheslav Fedotov appealed to the court with a request to leave Shevyakov’s claim without consideration - after all, the same case is being considered in the Perovsky court!
However, judge Antonova, despite the obvious ambiguity of the situation, remained adamant. Thus, I have a pleasure to inform the chairman of the Moscow City Court that two civil cases are being obeyed in the capital in two different ships in the same lawsuit: the recognition of the will of Natalia Vasilievna Fedotova invalid. Layers happen, everyday business. However, if it were all a common misunderstanding, it would be forgotten the next day.
But the fact of the matter is that this misunderstanding has some kind of suspicious smell.